In October 2019, the following were the rankings of the top 10 North Carolina counties based on the number of Federal Government employment they had for the 1021 Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry:
- Guilford: 2,886
- Mecklenburg: 2,820
- Wake: 2,540
- Onslow: 2,510
- Cumberland: 1,058
- Craven: 747
- Forsyth: 582
- Buncombe: 482
- Durham: 412
- New Hanover: 341
The following were the rankings of the top 10 North Carolina counties based on the number of Federal Government jobs added to the 1021 Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry in October 2019:
- Mecklenburg: 65
- Wake: 30
- Guilford: 17
- Henderson: 7
- Johnston: 7
- Catawba: 6
- Orange: 6
- Randolph: 6
- Davidson: 5
- Halifax: 5
In the two interactive visualizations and table below we show the number of Federal Government employment, and the number of jobs added to the 1021 Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry for each North Carolina county in the October 2019. We also have similar information for the following sectors: Local Government, and Private.
You can see this same information for other states, and for the United States by state as well.
See links at the bottom of this page for similar data for other months. You can also see the monthly links for many other years, as well as similar data for many more industries here.
County | Number of Employment | Jobs Added |
---|---|---|
Alamance | 228 | -1 |
Alexander | 56 | 0 |
Alleghany | 28 | -1 |
Anson | 41 | 1 |
Ashe | 52 | -1 |
Avery | 39 | 0 |
Beaufort | 86 | -3 |
Bertie | 30 | 0 |
Bladen | 39 | 0 |
Brunswick | 192 | -1 |
Buncombe | 482 | 1 |
Burke | 117 | 4 |
Cabarrus | 261 | -4 |
Caldwell | 112 | -3 |
Camden | 18 | 0 |
Carteret | 98 | 2 |
Caswell | 35 | 0 |
Catawba | 253 | 6 |
Chatham | 86 | 0 |
Cherokee | 73 | -2 |
Chowan | 24 | -2 |
Clay | 20 | 2 |
Cleveland | 147 | 2 |
Columbus | 101 | -1 |
Craven | 747 | -16 |
Cumberland | 1058 | 2 |
Currituck | 33 | 2 |
Dare | 56 | 0 |
Davidson | 177 | 5 |
Davie | 68 | 4 |
Duplin | 74 | 1 |
Durham | 412 | 0 |
Edgecombe | 160 | 1 |
Forsyth | 582 | -4 |
Franklin | 75 | 0 |
Gaston | 285 | -2 |
Gates | 10 | 0 |
Graham | 17 | -1 |
Granville | 78 | 2 |
Greene | 25 | 0 |
Guilford | 2886 | 17 |
Halifax | 97 | 5 |
Harnett | 119 | -2 |
Haywood | 97 | -1 |
Henderson | 179 | 7 |
Hertford | 46 | 0 |
Hoke | 61 | 0 |
Hyde | 14 | 0 |
Iredell | 225 | -7 |
Jackson | 43 | -1 |
Johnston | 204 | 7 |
Jones | 23 | -2 |
Lee | 107 | 3 |
Lenoir | 103 | -1 |
Lincoln | 123 | 5 |
McDowell | 63 | -1 |
Macon | 65 | 2 |
Madison | 39 | 0 |
Martin | 40 | -1 |
Mecklenburg | 2820 | 65 |
Mitchell | 29 | -2 |
Montgomery | 42 | 0 |
Moore | 176 | 1 |
Nash | 155 | 0 |
New Hanover | 341 | -1 |
Northampton | 36 | -1 |
Onslow | 2510 | -23 |
Orange | 222 | 6 |
Pamlico | 24 | 0 |
Pasquotank | 69 | 0 |
Pender | 82 | 4 |
Perquimans | 27 | 0 |
Person | 49 | 0 |
Pitt | 208 | -30 |
Polk | 49 | -1 |
Randolph | 170 | 6 |
Richmond | 66 | 2 |
Robeson | 168 | 3 |
Rockingham | 128 | 2 |
Rowan | 200 | 5 |
Rutherford | 98 | -4 |
Sampson | 76 | 0 |
Scotland | 46 | 1 |
Stanly | 92 | -2 |
Stokes | 69 | 2 |
Surry | 138 | -3 |
Swain | 20 | -1 |
Transylvania | 64 | 2 |
Tyrrell | 6 | -1 |
Union | 230 | -5 |
Vance | 55 | -1 |
Wake | 2540 | 30 |
Warren | 31 | 0 |
Washington | 25 | 0 |
Watauga | 80 | 4 |
Wayne | 250 | -1 |
Wilkes | 105 | -5 |
Wilson | 97 | 0 |
Yadkin | 63 | -2 |
Yancey | 31 | 2 |
Did you like the information on this page?