North Carolina Number of Local Government Business Establishments
in the Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry By County
in 2021 Q2
Updated on February 22, 2024.
According to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2023 Q2, North Carolina added 0 number of local government business establishments in the trade, transportation, and utilities industry. Among all North Carolina counties, Alamance added the highest number of local government business establishments (0), followed by Alexander (0), and Alleghany (0).
The first chart below shows the number of establishments by county and the second chart shows the number of establishments added by county. You can also see this information in the table below.
You can see similar information for other states, and for the United States.
You can see similar information for other industries.
Related Topics: North Carolina BLS Topic List.
Data Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics (QCEW).
See this for other quarters:
North Carolina Number of Local Government Business Establishments
in the Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry By County
in 2021 Q2
North Carolina Number of Local Government Business Establishments
Added in the Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry By County
in 2021 Q2
North Carolina Number of Local Government Business Establishments
in the Trade, transportation, and utilities Industry By County
in 2021 Q2
Items per page:
0 of 0
| County | Number of Business Establishments | Number of Business Esablishments Added |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 6 | 0 |
| Alexander | 2 | 0 |
| Alleghany | 1 | 0 |
| Anson | 1 | 0 |
| Ashe | 1 | 0 |
| Avery | 1 | 0 |
| Beaufort | 5 | 0 |
| Bertie | 1 | 0 |
| Bladen | 1 | 0 |
| Brunswick | 12 | 0 |
| Buncombe | 19 | 0 |
| Burke | 4 | 0 |
| Cabarrus | 3 | 0 |
| Caldwell | 3 | 0 |
| Camden | 1 | 0 |
| Carteret | 8 | 0 |
| Caswell | 4 | 0 |
| Catawba | 14 | 0 |
| Chatham | 4 | 0 |
| Cherokee | 3 | 0 |
| Chowan | 1 | 0 |
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
| Cleveland | 3 | 0 |
| Columbus | 5 | 0 |
| Craven | 8 | 0 |
| Cumberland | 12 | 0 |
| Currituck | 1 | 0 |
| Dare | 5 | 0 |
| Davidson | 4 | 0 |
| Davie | 2 | 0 |
| Duplin | 3 | 0 |
| Durham | 13 | 0 |
| Edgecombe | 7 | 0 |
| Forsyth | 12 | 0 |
| Franklin | 4 | 0 |
| Gaston | 9 | 0 |
| Gates | 1 | 0 |
| Granville | 2 | 0 |
| Greene | 1 | 0 |
| Guilford | 28 | 0 |
| Halifax | 11 | 0 |
| Harnett | 3 | 0 |
| Haywood | 5 | 0 |
| Henderson | 3 | 0 |
| Hertford | 1 | 0 |
| Hoke | 1 | 0 |
| Hyde | 2 | 0 |
| Iredell | 2 | 0 |
| Jackson | 1 | 0 |
| Johnston | 9 | 0 |
| Jones | 1 | 0 |
| Lee | 1 | 0 |
| Lenoir | 3 | 0 |
| Lincoln | 1 | 0 |
| McDowell | 1 | 0 |
| Martin | 1 | 0 |
| Mecklenburg | 35 | 0 |
| Mitchell | 1 | 0 |
| Montgomery | 1 | 0 |
| Moore | 5 | 0 |
| Nash | 10 | 0 |
| New Hanover | 11 | 0 |
| Northampton | 1 | 0 |
| Onslow | 8 | 0 |
| Orange | 13 | 0 |
| Pamlico | 1 | 0 |
| Pasquotank | 2 | 0 |
| Pender | 1 | 0 |
| Perquimans | 1 | 0 |
| Person | 1 | 0 |
| Pitt | 15 | 0 |
| Polk | 2 | 0 |
| Randolph | 4 | 0 |
| Richmond | 2 | 0 |
| Robeson | 7 | 0 |
| Rockingham | 5 | 0 |
| Rowan | 10 | 0 |
| Rutherford | 4 | 0 |
| Sampson | 3 | 0 |
| Scotland | 3 | 0 |
| Stanly | 4 | 0 |
| Stokes | 2 | 0 |
| Surry | 6 | 0 |
| Swain | 2 | 0 |
| Transylvania | 1 | 0 |
| Tyrrell | 1 | 0 |
| Union | 4 | 0 |
| Vance | 2 | 0 |
| Wake | 28 | 0 |
| Warren | 1 | 0 |
| Washington | 1 | 0 |
| Watauga | 3 | 0 |
| Wayne | 12 | 0 |
| Wilkes | 2 | 0 |
| Wilson | 9 | 0 |
| Yadkin | 1 | 0 |
| Yancey | 2 | 0 |