North Carolina Non-Hispanic Asian Alone Citizen Voting-age Population By County in 2024 (ACS-5Yrs)
Based on the US Census Bureau's special tabulation from the ACS 5-year estimates, in 2024, the Non-Hispanic Asian Alone citizen voting-age population for North Carolina was 38,050 and represented 0.48% of the total North Carolina citizen voting-age population.
Among all North Carolina counties, Wake had the highest Non-Hispanic Asian Alone citizen voting-age population (46.92K), followed by Mecklenburg (33.40K), and Guilford (15.13K).
In terms of percentages, Orange had the highest percentage of its citizen voting-age population being Non-Hispanic Asian Alone (5.87%), followed by Wake (5.69%), and Durham (4.28%).
The chart and table below shows the Non-Hispanic Asian Alone citizen voting-age population of each county and the percentage of each county's citizen voting-age population that were Non-Hispanic Asian Alone.
You can see similar information for other states and by state for the United States.
You can also see similar information for other ethnicities.
| County | Citizen Voting-age Population | % of County Citizen Voting-age Population |
|---|---|---|
| Wake | 46916 | 5.69 |
| Mecklenburg | 33404 | 4.25 |
| Guilford | 15129 | 3.80 |
| Durham | 10174 | 4.28 |
| Orange | 6598 | 5.87 |
| Cabarrus | 5941 | 3.64 |
| Union | 5617 | 3.24 |
| Cumberland | 5516 | 2.25 |
| Forsyth | 4852 | 1.73 |
| Catawba | 4577 | 3.73 |
| Iredell | 3076 | 2.11 |
| Onslow | 2803 | 1.83 |
| Gaston | 2437 | 1.39 |
| Buncombe | 2013 | 0.93 |
| Burke | 1984 | 2.84 |
| Alamance | 1944 | 1.52 |
| New Hanover | 1883 | 1.01 |
| Davidson | 1673 | 1.28 |
| Craven | 1672 | 2.11 |
| Pitt | 1639 | 1.22 |
| Johnston | 1413 | 0.86 |
| Chatham | 1250 | 2.09 |
| Henderson | 968 | 1.06 |
| Randolph | 929 | 0.87 |
| Rowan | 881 | 0.80 |
| Harnett | 859 | 0.87 |
| Moore | 854 | 1.07 |
| Wayne | 854 | 1.01 |
| Stanly | 807 | 1.64 |
| Brunswick | 748 | 0.58 |
| Lincoln | 524 | 0.74 |
| Wilson | 513 | 0.88 |
| Cleveland | 493 | 0.64 |
| Carteret | 446 | 0.79 |
| Nash | 442 | 0.61 |
| Hoke | 426 | 1.14 |
| Franklin | 403 | 0.72 |
| Robeson | 398 | 0.48 |
| Lee | 391 | 0.85 |
| Watauga | 383 | 0.81 |
| Pasquotank | 363 | 1.15 |
| Alexander | 326 | 1.13 |
| Scotland | 317 | 1.25 |
| Richmond | 306 | 0.97 |
| Halifax | 264 | 0.72 |
| Rockingham | 261 | 0.36 |
| McDowell | 246 | 0.70 |
| Jackson | 237 | 0.67 |
| Duplin | 231 | 0.70 |
| Caldwell | 225 | 0.36 |
| Pender | 219 | 0.45 |
| Granville | 218 | 0.48 |
| Anson | 207 | 1.19 |
| Currituck | 204 | 0.87 |
| Sampson | 198 | 0.49 |
| Surry | 188 | 0.35 |
| Macon | 171 | 0.57 |
| Wilkes | 166 | 0.33 |
| Haywood | 156 | 0.31 |
| Rutherford | 149 | 0.29 |
| Montgomery | 147 | 0.76 |
| Cherokee | 141 | 0.57 |
| Columbus | 139 | 0.36 |
| Polk | 139 | 0.84 |
| Lenoir | 130 | 0.32 |
| Vance | 130 | 0.42 |
| Camden | 128 | 1.53 |
| Davie | 126 | 0.38 |
| Dare | 116 | 0.38 |
| Hertford | 115 | 0.74 |
| Transylvania | 111 | 0.40 |
| Edgecombe | 106 | 0.29 |
| Bertie | 104 | 0.74 |
| Ashe | 103 | 0.47 |
| Madison | 92 | 0.51 |
| Beaufort | 82 | 0.24 |
| Martin | 78 | 0.46 |
| Caswell | 77 | 0.43 |
| Avery | 68 | 0.47 |
| Jones | 68 | 0.91 |
| Mitchell | 68 | 0.56 |
| Pamlico | 57 | 0.55 |
| Perquimans | 56 | 0.52 |
| Graham | 54 | 0.84 |
| Alleghany | 50 | 0.56 |
| Yadkin | 44 | 0.16 |
| Person | 43 | 0.14 |
| Clay | 37 | 0.39 |
| Yancey | 26 | 0.17 |
| Stokes | 24 | 0.07 |
| Warren | 24 | 0.16 |
| Swain | 22 | 0.20 |
| Northampton | 10 | 0.07 |
| Bladen | 6 | 0.03 |
| Chowan | 6 | 0.06 |
| Greene | 2 | 0.01 |
| Gates | 0 | 0.00 |
| Hyde | 0 | 0.00 |
| Tyrrell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Washington | 0 | 0.00 |
