North Carolina Hispanic - Asian Alone Voting-age Population By County from Census 2020
According to the data from the US 2020 decennial Census, as at April 2020, the voting-age population of people who identified as Hispanic - Asian Alone in North Carolina was 1,919; and represented 0.02% of the total North Carolina voting-age population.
Mecklenburg County had the highest number of people who identified as Hispanic - Asian Alone (280), followed by Wake County (236), and Cumberland County (156). On the other hand, the three counties with low Hispanic - Asian Alone voting-age population were: Yancey County (0), Yadkin County (0), and Wilson County (0).
When it comes to the percentage of each county's voting-age population that identified as Hispanic - Asian Alone, Pamlico County had the highest percentage (0.10%), followed by Onslow County (0.07%), and Cumberland County (0.06%).
Hover over or click on the counties to see the number and percentage of each county's Hispanic - Asian Alone voting-age population. The data can also be filtered, sorted, and explored further in a table below.
You can see similar information for other ethnicities, and also for the different racial groups in North Carolina.
You can also see this information for other states and also for the US by state.
| County | Hispanic - Asian Alone Voting-age Pop. | % of County Voting-age Population |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 22 | 0.02 |
| Alexander | 0 | 0.00 |
| Alleghany | 0 | 0.00 |
| Anson | 0 | 0.00 |
| Ashe | 0 | 0.00 |
| Avery | 3 | 0.02 |
| Beaufort | 0 | 0.00 |
| Bertie | 0 | 0.00 |
| Bladen | 1 | 0.00 |
| Brunswick | 10 | 0.01 |
| Buncombe | 35 | 0.02 |
| Burke | 8 | 0.01 |
| Cabarrus | 36 | 0.02 |
| Caldwell | 17 | 0.03 |
| Camden | 0 | 0.00 |
| Carteret | 9 | 0.02 |
| Caswell | 3 | 0.02 |
| Catawba | 33 | 0.03 |
| Chatham | 8 | 0.01 |
| Cherokee | 0 | 0.00 |
| Chowan | 1 | 0.01 |
| Clay | 0 | 0.00 |
| Cleveland | 6 | 0.01 |
| Columbus | 5 | 0.01 |
| Craven | 28 | 0.04 |
| Cumberland | 156 | 0.06 |
| Currituck | 6 | 0.03 |
| Dare | 4 | 0.01 |
| Davidson | 17 | 0.01 |
| Davie | 3 | 0.01 |
| Duplin | 12 | 0.03 |
| Durham | 72 | 0.03 |
| Edgecombe | 1 | 0.00 |
| Forsyth | 60 | 0.02 |
| Franklin | 11 | 0.02 |
| Gaston | 25 | 0.01 |
| Gates | 4 | 0.05 |
| Graham | 2 | 0.03 |
| Granville | 4 | 0.01 |
| Greene | 0 | 0.00 |
| Guilford | 128 | 0.03 |
| Halifax | 3 | 0.01 |
| Harnett | 52 | 0.05 |
| Haywood | 10 | 0.02 |
| Henderson | 44 | 0.05 |
| Hertford | 10 | 0.06 |
| Hoke | 18 | 0.05 |
| Hyde | 0 | 0.00 |
| Iredell | 30 | 0.02 |
| Jackson | 5 | 0.01 |
| Johnston | 33 | 0.02 |
| Jones | 2 | 0.03 |
| Lee | 15 | 0.03 |
| Lenoir | 4 | 0.01 |
| Lincoln | 7 | 0.01 |
| McDowell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Macon | 5 | 0.02 |
| Madison | 3 | 0.02 |
| Martin | 0 | 0.00 |
| Mecklenburg | 280 | 0.03 |
| Mitchell | 2 | 0.02 |
| Montgomery | 0 | 0.00 |
| Moore | 20 | 0.03 |
| Nash | 9 | 0.01 |
| New Hanover | 39 | 0.02 |
| Northampton | 0 | 0.00 |
| Onslow | 112 | 0.07 |
| Orange | 49 | 0.04 |
| Pamlico | 10 | 0.10 |
| Pasquotank | 11 | 0.03 |
| Pender | 18 | 0.04 |
| Perquimans | 1 | 0.01 |
| Person | 1 | 0.00 |
| Pitt | 14 | 0.01 |
| Polk | 0 | 0.00 |
| Randolph | 8 | 0.01 |
| Richmond | 4 | 0.01 |
| Robeson | 10 | 0.01 |
| Rockingham | 5 | 0.01 |
| Rowan | 4 | 0.00 |
| Rutherford | 5 | 0.01 |
| Sampson | 12 | 0.03 |
| Scotland | 4 | 0.02 |
| Stanly | 5 | 0.01 |
| Stokes | 0 | 0.00 |
| Surry | 4 | 0.01 |
| Swain | 0 | 0.00 |
| Transylvania | 0 | 0.00 |
| Tyrrell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Union | 39 | 0.02 |
| Vance | 2 | 0.01 |
| Wake | 236 | 0.03 |
| Warren | 0 | 0.00 |
| Washington | 0 | 0.00 |
| Watauga | 7 | 0.02 |
| Wayne | 36 | 0.04 |
| Wilkes | 1 | 0.00 |
| Wilson | 0 | 0.00 |
| Yadkin | 0 | 0.00 |
| Yancey | 0 | 0.00 |