Pohlmans Meat Processing Plant: Non-Compliance to Humane Livestock Handling in 2025 Q1 (USDA)

Updated on January 15, 2026.

See the detail of the non-compliance of humane livestock handling that the USDA observed at the Pohlmans Meat Processing Plant slaughterhouse establishment in 2025 Q1.

You can also see other establishments that were non-compliant in 2025 Q1.

Data Source: USDA.
See this for other quarters:
Inspection Date: 2024-12-10
Inspection Category: Routine
NR Number: WMD3312125211N-1
Non-Compliance Regulations:

313.15(a)(1)

Non-Compliance Description:

On 12/10/2024, at approximately 0800 hours, while performing a HATS Category VIII task with stunning effectiveness at Pohlman Meats Processing (M6961+V6961), I, Dr. REDACTED, District Veterinary Medical Officer (DVMO), observed the following instance of noncompliance: A black heifer was placed in the knock box with its head restrained. The animal was pulling against the head restrainer. Mr. REDACTED (owner) then applied a handheld (penetrating) captive bolt (HHCB) to the animal's head and discharged it. Although the bolt made contact and penetrated the skull, it was ineffective, as the animal remained standing and continued to move its head. Mr. REDACTED subsequently picked up a second handheld captive bolt, which was already loaded and ready for use, and applied a second stun. At this point, the animal dropped to the floor and was rendered unconscious. The employee then reloaded the HHCB and applied three more security stuns in quick succession while the animal was unconscious on the floor. Of these three security stuns, the first two were muffled, and only the third security sun made a normal loud bang and was effective in penetrating the skull. To examine the stun sites, the hide was removed from the head. Three handheld captive bolt penetrating wounds were identified: one at the center of the forehead and two others located on either side of the central wound. At this point, I informed Mr. REDACTED, the owner, about the noncompliance and took verbal regulatory control of the knock box. Consumer safety inspector (CSI) Mr. REDACTED tagged the knock box with the U.S. Rejected Tag #B 21623830.I explained to Mr. REDACTED that this situation violated 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1) and requested immediate corrective action before proceeding with the slaughter operation. Mr. REDACTED then went to the supply room to retrieve two new cartridges, which he used to load the HHCB for the next heifer to be slaughtered. After this, I removed the USDA reject tag from the knock box and lifted the regulatory control action over it.