North Carolina Hispanic Asian alone Population By County in 2010
Based on the US Census Vintage data estimates, in 2010, there were 6,594 people that identified as Hispanic Asian alone in North Carolina and they represented 0.07% of the total population of North Carolina in 2010. Mecklenburg County had the highest number of Hispanic Asian alone population (936), followed by Wake County (660), and Cumberland County (390). On the other hand, Yancey County had the lowest number of Hispanic Asian alone (0), followed by Washington County (0), and Tyrrell County (0).
When it comes to the percentage of each county's population that identified as Hispanic Asian alone, Onslow County had the highest percentage (0.21%), followed by Duplin County (0.18%), and Durham County (0.13%).
You can see similar information for other ethnicity and racial groups in North Carolina.
You can also see similar information for other states and also by state for the United States.
Hover over or click on the counties to see the number and percentage of each county's Hispanic Asian alone population. The data can also be filtered, sorted, and explored further in a table below.
| County | Hispanic Asian alone Population | % of County Population |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 77 | 0.05 |
| Alexander | 5 | 0.01 |
| Alleghany | 5 | 0.05 |
| Anson | 12 | 0.05 |
| Ashe | 1 | 0 |
| Avery | 2 | 0.01 |
| Beaufort | 27 | 0.06 |
| Bertie | 0 | 0 |
| Bladen | 7 | 0.02 |
| Brunswick | 41 | 0.04 |
| Buncombe | 94 | 0.04 |
| Burke | 97 | 0.11 |
| Cabarrus | 158 | 0.09 |
| Caldwell | 26 | 0.03 |
| Camden | 6 | 0.06 |
| Carteret | 13 | 0.02 |
| Caswell | 0 | 0 |
| Catawba | 103 | 0.07 |
| Chatham | 44 | 0.07 |
| Cherokee | 2 | 0.01 |
| Chowan | 1 | 0.01 |
| Clay | 0 | 0 |
| Cleveland | 46 | 0.05 |
| Columbus | 40 | 0.07 |
| Craven | 82 | 0.08 |
| Cumberland | 390 | 0.12 |
| Currituck | 17 | 0.07 |
| Dare | 2 | 0.01 |
| Davidson | 116 | 0.07 |
| Davie | 35 | 0.09 |
| Duplin | 107 | 0.18 |
| Durham | 355 | 0.13 |
| Edgecombe | 0 | 0 |
| Forsyth | 245 | 0.07 |
| Franklin | 51 | 0.08 |
| Gaston | 45 | 0.02 |
| Gates | 1 | 0.01 |
| Graham | 0 | 0 |
| Granville | 10 | 0.02 |
| Greene | 7 | 0.03 |
| Guilford | 312 | 0.06 |
| Halifax | 21 | 0.04 |
| Harnett | 134 | 0.12 |
| Haywood | 11 | 0.02 |
| Henderson | 42 | 0.04 |
| Hertford | 29 | 0.12 |
| Hoke | 61 | 0.13 |
| Hyde | 1 | 0.02 |
| Iredell | 70 | 0.04 |
| Jackson | 18 | 0.05 |
| Johnston | 150 | 0.09 |
| Jones | 0 | 0 |
| Lee | 66 | 0.11 |
| Lenoir | 23 | 0.04 |
| Lincoln | 19 | 0.02 |
| McDowell | 45 | 0.1 |
| Macon | 14 | 0.04 |
| Madison | 3 | 0.01 |
| Martin | 4 | 0.02 |
| Mecklenburg | 936 | 0.1 |
| Mitchell | 4 | 0.03 |
| Montgomery | 15 | 0.05 |
| Moore | 35 | 0.04 |
| Nash | 124 | 0.13 |
| New Hanover | 104 | 0.05 |
| Northampton | 8 | 0.04 |
| Onslow | 385 | 0.21 |
| Orange | 64 | 0.05 |
| Pamlico | 2 | 0.02 |
| Pasquotank | 24 | 0.06 |
| Pender | 48 | 0.09 |
| Perquimans | 15 | 0.11 |
| Person | 17 | 0.04 |
| Pitt | 162 | 0.1 |
| Polk | 26 | 0.13 |
| Randolph | 73 | 0.05 |
| Richmond | 18 | 0.04 |
| Robeson | 63 | 0.05 |
| Rockingham | 24 | 0.03 |
| Rowan | 52 | 0.04 |
| Rutherford | 12 | 0.02 |
| Sampson | 82 | 0.13 |
| Scotland | 0 | 0 |
| Stanly | 28 | 0.05 |
| Stokes | 2 | 0 |
| Surry | 51 | 0.07 |
| Swain | 2 | 0.01 |
| Transylvania | 1 | 0 |
| Tyrrell | 0 | 0 |
| Union | 93 | 0.05 |
| Vance | 8 | 0.02 |
| Wake | 660 | 0.07 |
| Warren | 7 | 0.03 |
| Washington | 0 | 0 |
| Watauga | 19 | 0.04 |
| Wayne | 77 | 0.06 |
| Wilkes | 4 | 0.01 |
| Wilson | 35 | 0.04 |
| Yadkin | 21 | 0.06 |
| Yancey | 0 | 0 |